original_aj: (Default)
([personal profile] original_aj Nov. 27th, 2005 04:26 pm)
"Amamanta Family is a set of educational anatomically correct dolls.

They are ideal for explaining the human reproductive cycle to boys and girls ages 3 to 10. From conception and birth of babies, breastfeeding, sexual education to demonstrating appropriate versus inappropriate touching.

These dolls include true anatomical details such as stitched on genitals and breasts. This means that children and parents alike will find the dolls true-to-life and see themselves as naturally complete and OK. "

Shame they're rather naff rag dolls, and not particularly accurate.

From: [identity profile] mary919.livejournal.com


The baby with a snap for a mouth is rather scary. And he has no nose.

From: [identity profile] original-aj.livejournal.com


Our daughters had a doll with a baby, thay had magnets in their mouths so they would "Kiss". When they got close they would pull togeather - which would be omer realistic than fiddling with a press stud!
zotz: (Default)

From: [personal profile] zotz


true anatomical details such as stitched on genitals

Err . . . mine aren't stitched on. Am I different and strange?

From: [identity profile] wee0ne.livejournal.com


and an unbelievable crap website (a 3-year-old could do it better!)

From: [identity profile] original-aj.livejournal.com


They were too busy being earnest, and worthwhile to have time for design considerations. Anyway, given what they think a naked person looks like I don't think their eyesight's up to much!
.

Profile

original_aj: (Default)
original_aj
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags